Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

North Caroline, ex rel. Cooper v. Tennessee Valley Authority (Assignment)

North Caroline, ex rel. Cooper v. Tennessee Valley Authority (Assignment)

Q Attached Files: • NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. COOPER v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY.pdf (128.925 KB) Read the North Caroline, ex rel. Cooper v. Tennessee Valley Authority case and answer the following questions: • What is the main issue/controversy in this case? • The Circuit Court refers to a state nuisance law as “an ill-defined omnibus tort of last resort.” What problem could you anticipate if states were permitted to enact nuisance regulations applying more stringent guidelines to environmental emissions than what is already covered and proscribed by federal legislation?• What would be the dangers/implications for a business/corporation if state nuisance laws were enforced to regulate environmental emissions?

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

Although the summary judgement of the case scenario seems appropriate from every context, it can be said that their does not lie any such genuine issue related to the cases fact. While on the other hand, it can be noticed that a ruling for the moving party was considered reasonable as a matter of law. However, if suggested from an overall context, I would like to say yes there surely exists an issue and that is, whether the proof is such that a justified jury member can return back the statement for the non-motion party.